AI Review

Review changes with the evidence in view.

Angada turns GitHub pull requests into a focused review surface: findings with severity, file and line context, explanations, and a useful next step for the author.

Review
Wiki
Notifications
Workspace
ReviewFindings

Findings

VerdictPull requestRepoUpdated
Reviewed
feat(billing): prorate seat changes mid-cycle
orbit/payments · #41223m ago
Not reviewed
fix(auth): refresh token rotation drops concurrent sessions
orbit/api · #40918m ago
Not reviewed
refactor(orders): extract fulfilment adapter
orbit/api · #40844m ago
Not reviewed
feat(payments): add provider event replay guard
orbit/payments · #40644m ago
Not reviewed
test(webhooks): cover duplicate delivery
orbit/payments · #40547m ago
Not reviewed
chore: release payment SDK
orbit/payments · #4041h ago
Not reviewed
feat(checkout): retry declined authorizations
orbit/api · #4032h ago
Reviewed
fix(queue): bound retry delay during gateway outage
orbit/payments · #4011h ago
Not reviewed
docs: document refund webhook retries
orbit/payments · #4003h ago
Not reviewed
fix(ledger): reconcile delayed settlements
orbit/payments · #3994h ago
Not reviewed
test(payments): cover concurrent captures
orbit/api · #3985h ago
Not reviewed
feat(api): expose refund history
orbit/api · #3976h ago
Not reviewed
chore(ci): tighten webhook fixture timeouts
orbit/api · #3968h ago
Not reviewed
fix(web): surface capture failures in checkout
orbit/api · #3959h ago
Not reviewed
feat(invoices): preview upcoming seat charges
orbit/payments · #39411h ago
Not reviewed
revert: drop unused capture idempotency key
orbit/api · #39314h ago
16 of 16 pull requestsPage 1 of 1

Anatomy of a review

What shows up in an Angada review.

Each finding keeps severity, evidence, explanation, and a useful next step together. The walkthrough above shows one complete example; these cells name the parts.

  • A code review finding with a highlighted reliability risk

    Prioritize

    Know what needs attention.

    See the pull request verdict and the findings that deserve a closer look before opening the details.

  • Code evidence connected to a review explanation

    Investigate

    See why it matters.

    Every finding stays anchored to the changed code, with context and an explanation that makes the risk clear.

  • A suggested code diff handed off to coding tools

    Resolve

    Carry the fix forward.

    Move from a focused suggestion to your preferred coding agent without losing the review context.

Controls

Review when you want it.

Decide when review runs and how loud findings should be before a pull request moves on. Workspace access still depends on the entitlements enabled for that workspace.

  1. Review draft pull requests

    Choose whether draft PRs get reviewed before they are marked ready.

  2. Minimum severity

    Set a severity threshold so quieter findings stay out of the way until they matter.

  3. Run on demand

    Trigger a review manually when the team wants a pass without waiting for the next push.