Built for engineering teams

Review changes.
Understand your codebase.

AI code review and source-linked documentation for teams shipping on GitHub.

Search⌘ K

Review

Wiki

Notifications

Workspace

ReviewFindings

Status

Verdict	Pull request	Repo	Updated
Reviewed	feat(billing): prorate seat changes mid-cycle	orbit/payments · #412	23m ago
Not reviewed	fix(auth): refresh token rotation drops concurrent sessions	orbit/api · #409	18m ago
Not reviewed	refactor(orders): extract fulfilment adapter	orbit/api · #408	44m ago
Not reviewed	feat(payments): add provider event replay guard	orbit/payments · #406	44m ago
Not reviewed	test(webhooks): cover duplicate delivery	orbit/payments · #405	47m ago
Not reviewed	chore: release payment SDK	orbit/payments · #404	1h ago
Not reviewed	feat(checkout): retry declined authorizations	orbit/api · #403	2h ago
Reviewed	fix(queue): bound retry delay during gateway outage	orbit/payments · #401	1h ago
Not reviewed	docs: document refund webhook retries	orbit/payments · #400	3h ago
Not reviewed	fix(ledger): reconcile delayed settlements	orbit/payments · #399	4h ago
Not reviewed	test(payments): cover concurrent captures	orbit/api · #398	5h ago
Not reviewed	feat(api): expose refund history	orbit/api · #397	6h ago
Not reviewed	chore(ci): tighten webhook fixture timeouts	orbit/api · #396	8h ago
Not reviewed	fix(web): surface capture failures in checkout	orbit/api · #395	9h ago
Not reviewed	feat(invoices): preview upcoming seat charges	orbit/payments · #394	11h ago
Not reviewed	revert: drop unused capture idempotency key	orbit/api · #393	14h ago

AI Review

Findings with a trail back to the code.

Angada reviews the changes that matter, then gives your team the file, line, and reasoning behind each finding. Read the evidence or hand a fix prompt to the tool you already use.

Severity and confidence in context
Summaries that respect the whole pull request
Fix prompts for Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex

Explore AI Review

AI Review

High · 0.94 confidenceReliability

Webhook deliveries can be applied twice

packages/payments/src/webhooks.ts · lines 18–21

The handler updates the payment and records a ledger entry for every delivery. Payment providers retry events, so the same event can create duplicate ledger entries unless the provider event ID is stored and checked first.

packages/payments/src/webhooks.ts18–21

18const event = await parseProviderEvent(request)19const payment = await applyPaymentEvent(event)20await ledger.record(payment)21return new Response("ok")

Suggestion

 const payment = await applyPaymentEvent(event)-await ledger.record(payment)+await ledger.recordIdempotent(payment, event.id)

Suggested next step

Persist the provider event ID inside the transaction, then cover a repeated delivery with a regression test.

Cursor Claude Code Codex

AI Wiki

orbit / payments · Repository overview

Payments repository overview

The payments package owns capture, webhook normalization, and ledger writes. It sits between product clients and external payment processors, with the event bus carrying durable updates to downstream services.

Client apps and provider webhooks flow into the Payments service, then the Ledger

AI Wiki

Your codebase, explained.

Angada generates a living wiki from your repository with source references included. Give new teammates a map, give experienced ones the missing context, and know when a page was last refreshed.

Source citations linked to repository files
Architecture diagrams and searchable pages
Configured, asynchronous refreshes

Explore AI Wiki

Attention queueSee review, CI, and conflict signals together.

Living Slack messagesUpdate one message as the pull request moves from opened to merged.

Personal digestsMake the next action obvious without another dashboard.

Explore coordination

The coordination layer

One pull request. One living message.

GitHub sends the event, Angada resolves what matters, and Slack keeps the same card current as the review moves forward.

GitHubevent sourceAngadastate engineSlacksame message

Works where you do

Fits into your development workflow.

Native connections

The connections Angada supports directly today.

GitHubRepository context, pull requests, and review findings.Available SlackLiving updates, blocker mentions, and team digests.Available MCPPR status, open pull requests, and your personal PRs.Available

Fix-prompt handoffs

Use the tool you already have for the next step.

CursorCopy a focused fix prompt into your editor workflow.Fix-prompt handoff

Claude CodeContinue from a finding with a source-aware fix prompt.Fix-prompt handoff

CodexTake a review finding into your coding agent with context.Fix-prompt handoff

Not available yet

We will share availability here when the connection is ready.

GitLabRepository connection is not available yet.Planned

BitbucketRepository connection is not available yet.Planned

Microsoft TeamsTeam notifications are not available yet.Planned

Clear boundaries for your code and data.

See how Angada uses repository content and where your data is processed before you connect a project.

Learn more

Your code remains yours.

Angada processes connected repositories to produce reviews and wikis. We do not train our own models on your repositories, and route requests away from providers that train on prompts.

Core data hosted in the EU.

Most personal data is stored and processed in the EU. AI reviews use disclosed model providers in other regions.

Before you connect a repository

Good questions deserve direct answers.

What does Angada actually read?

AI Review and AI Wiki read repository content to generate findings and documentation. Angada only receives access to the repository context you select.

Can we verify what the AI is saying?

Yes. Review findings include file and line context, while Wiki pages link explanations back to their source.

Will it fit our existing tools?

Angada connects to GitHub and Slack, and hands fix prompts to Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex when you choose.

Read about security

Make the next review clearer

Bring your codebase into focus.

Start with a GitHub repository and see the evidence for yourself.

Start with GitHub

Review changes.Understand your codebase.

Findings